Over the Airwaves
 The Bi-Weekly Journal for the Proficient Pilot

Sunday,  December 4, 2005                        Vol. II No. 24
Free sign up.  Click
HERE.               

Welcome to the Over the Airwaves aviation journal.  This complimentary bi-weekly e-mailing is being sent to pilots and aviation enthusiasts around the world.  Its aim is to promote flight safety, encourage students and new pilots, and to build enthusiasm for aviation in general. 
 
X

"Ten feet off the ground, upside down, at 250 mph isn't a place to have an ego.."
                                 
— Air show performer, Sean Tucker.


Dear Pilots and Aviation Enthusiasts:      

 

Airplane Utility

We all have our favorite aviation periodicals.  One of my favorites is  IFR Magazine published by Belvoir Media Group, LLC.  This insightful rag comes out every month.  Anyway, the December, 2005 issue contains an editorial piece by Jeff Van West that strikes to the heart of the general aviation accident rate.

The author talks about a rapidly fading breed pilots who really know how to fly airplanes.  He spoke of one pilot named Win.  A retired Air Force colonel, Win was described as "a guy who would fly an IMC descending spiral, in formation, on a radial/DME until getting 500 feet above a charted terrain elevation to see if he could get under the weather to support the troops.  This guy is tough, unforgiving, sharp as a tack, and a maestro with a stick and throttle."

The other guy was called Rev.  A retired Lockheed test pilot, Rev took great delight in teaching CFIs short field operations in a Cessna 182.  He particularly enjoyed loading up the 182 with three young CFIs and going out on short grass strips.  Upon reaching about 70 percent of takeoff speed he would stomp on a rudder, forcing the airplane into an immediate ground loop.  It was the job of each CFI to recover by keeping the wings level and the tail end out of trouble!

Author Jeff Van West made the point that these old timers taught pilots how to REALLY fly airplanes just as a father adjusts a child's hand on a hammer when teaching him how to use the tool.  He added, "They did it with the stern, but patient confidence that can only come from a wealth of experience in wind and weather."

Unfortunately, this kind of training is rapidly disappearing.  Van West adds that "the pool of pilots who can teach it thins with time, and liability concerns . . ."   This problem will worsen in the future as the number of experienced check hauling freight dog pilots diminish due to electronic check transfers.

The article states that we "desperately need these mentors" to protect us from our own technology.  "We need these mentors to teach their real-world skills that can get us out of places where survival may depend on knowing how to make a descending spiral through the clouds at high speed to an airfield obstructed on all sides."

As Van West concludes, "Even in this world of digital wizardry, you still need to know how to swing a hammer."

Unfortunately, we seldom see hammer swingers in today's flight schools.  Instead, we are viewing the emergence of a new generation of young flight instructors who were never inside a freezing cloud, nor  experienced bone jarring turbulence, nor permitted to take off in a 19 knot crosswind. 

Heaven knows what these hammer-challenged flight instructors have left to pass along to their students other than how to meet the minimum standards contained in the PTS.

Suggestion:  If you are one of these hammer-challenged CFIs or if you were taken through your last rating by one of these CFIs, do yourself a life-saving favor.  Find a veteran CFI who can safely take you to the edge of the envelope and back.  Sign up for an aerobatic or upset recovery training from an experienced school or instructor.   Don't stop training until you can recover from a fully coupled spin, find your way out of a turbulent cloud on partial panel, and safely land in a 19 to 25 knot crosswind.

When you can do this, you'll REALLY know how to swing the hammer!

Fly Safe!

Bob Miller, ATP, MCFI
Master Certificated Flight Instructor
Buffalo, NY
rjma@rjma.com
716-864-8100


 

It's Winter ... Get Out and Fly!

Without question, winter is the best time of the year to fly!The jaw-jarring thermals of summer are all at rest.  Ever-present thunderstorms are in hibernation.  The heat-soaked haze is all gone leaving crystal clear air that enables you to see crisp horizons around the entire compass.

Somewhere, wintertime flying got a bad rap.  Ill-informed graduates of Florida and Arizona flight schools warn, "Don't approach anything resembling instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) above the Mason-Dixon line in winter.  The ice monster will reach out and cripple you with ice.  Then you die!"

Airplanes and Pilots Age Prematurely!

Evidence of this bad rap can be seen at hundreds of little airports in the northern climates that seem to roll up their runways and pad lock their offices until Spring.  Inside their frozen hangars, airplane engines rust, control cables stiffen and pulley hubs dry out.  Five or six months of inactivity adds years of premature age their airplanes . . . and to their owners!

Few things are harder on airplanes than allowing them to sit idle for four or five months at a time.  And don't think you can solve the problem by taking a quick flight around the pattern.  It takes at least an hour or more of continuous flight to burn off any moisture in the engine.

Four Faulty Reasons Why Pilots Don't Fly in the Winter . . .

1. It's too cold:  Sure it's cold in the winter.  But cold doesn't bother skiers.  Millions of Americans flock to the slopes every winter.  Ever ride an open chairlift in 30 knot winds to the top of Killington in Vermont when the wind chill fell below minus 22 degrees F?  Compared to that, flying is like spending several hours in a toasty sauna!

2. Icy cold starts are hard on an engine:  They sure are, so don't make icy cold starts.  There are dozens of engine pre-heating solutions available to the winter pilot.  Be creative!

3. Winter weather is hazardous:  Bogus argument!  Winter weather requires specialized knowledge on how to deal with it.  Here in Buffalo, NY, we have, arguably, the most challenging winter weather anywhere in the nation.  Sitting in the midst of the moisture-laden Great Lakes, lake effect snow can turn a CAVU day into the inside of a frozen car wash in seconds.  Nonetheless, those of us who regularly fly up here in winter have learned how to deal with these occasional conditions.

4. Low ceilings, icy clouds:  Yep . . . we have cold, overcast clouds, but unless they are situated under a passing front, these clouds frequently top out below 5,000 feet.    IFR pilots, get a tops and icing report before launching.  You'd be surprised how often this cold cloud canopy can be safely punched through to sunny skies above. 

Caution:  Winter flight operations are fun but they require special skills.  Be sure you have them!

The typical flight school response to winter conditions is to cancel training whenever it is windy, snowy, slippery, visibility is poor, and/or when the ceilings drop below 1,000'.  Consequently, entire generations of pilots are being produced who are winter-phobic!   It is little wonder why we see winter flying dwindling to a trickle here in the north.

You can solve this problem by obtaining specialized wintertime flight training.  Learn to maneuver on an ice-covered airport surface.  Learn to use power and rudder to prevent sliding into a snow bank.  Learn to approach and kick out of a 45 degree forward side-slip just as you touch down when your windscreen is frosted over.  Learn what to do when you are carrying a couple of inches of ice on your horizontal stabilizer. 

Yes . . . winter operations, like mountain flying, requires specialized training.  Unfortunately, this kind of training does not come with the private pilot certificate in most cases.  It should, but it doesn't.

 

Remembering those Critical
IFR Altitudes

You knew them for your instrument check ride . . . but do you remember their significance today?  They are the MEA, MOCA, OROCA, MCA, and the MRA.  They were significant back then, but in the free flight, GPS direct world we operate in today, they are even more significant.

MEA (Minimum enroute altitude):

The MEA is the lowest published altitude between radio fixes that assures acceptable navigational signal coverage and meets obstacle clearance requirements between those fixes.  MEAs are established based upon obstacle clearance over terrain and manmade objects, adequacy of navigation facility performance, and communications requirements, although adequate communication at the MEA is not guaranteed.


MOCA (Minimum Obstruction Clearance Altitude):

The MOCA is the lowest published altitude in effect between radio fixes on VOR airways, off-airway routes, or route segments that meets obstacle clearance requirements for the entire route segment. This altitude also assures acceptable navigational signal coverage only within 22NM of a VOR.


Minimum Vectoring Altitude (MVA):

MVAs are established for use by ATC when radar ATC is exercised. The minimum vectoring altitude provides 1,000 feet of clearance above the highest obstacle in nonmountainous areas and 2,000 feet above the highest obstacle in designated mountainous areas. Because of the ability to isolate specific obstacles, some MVAs may be lower than MEAs, MOCAs, or other minimum altitudes depicted on charts for a given location. While being radar vectored, IFR altitude assignments by ATC are normally at or abovethe MVA.


Minimum Reception Altitude (MRA):

Minimum reception altitudes (MRAs) are determined by FAA flight inspection traversing an entire route of flight to establish the minimum altitude the navigation signal can be received for the route and for off-course NAVAID facilities that determine a fix. When the MRA at the fix is higher than the MEA, an MRA is established for the fix, and is the lowest altitude at which an intersection can be determined.


Minimum Crossing Altitude (MCA):

The MCA is the lowest altitude at certain fixes at which the aircraft must cross when proceeding in the direction of a higher minimum en route IFR altitude. MCAs are established in all cases where obstacles intervene to prevent pilots from maintaining obstacle clearance during a normal climb to a higher MEA after passing a point beyond which the higher MEA applies.


Maximum Authorized Altitude (MAA):

An MAA is a published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on a Federal airway, jet route, RNAV low or high route, or other direct route for which an MEA is designated at which adequate reception of navigation signals is assured. MAAs represent procedural limits determined by technical limitations or other factors such as limited airspace or frequency interference of ground based facilities.


Off-Route Obstacle Clearance Altitude (OROCA):

An  (OROCA) is an off-route altitude that provides obstruction clearance with a 1,000-foot buffer in nonmountainous terrain areas and a 2,000-foot buffer in designated mountainous areas within the U.S. This

 

altitude may not provide signal coverage from ground-based navigational aids, air traffic control radar, or communications coverage. OROCAs are intended primarily as a pilot tool for emergencies and situational awareness. OROCAs depicted on NACO en route charts do not provide you with an acceptable altitude for terrain and obstruction clearance for the purposes of off-route, random RNAV direct flights in either controlled or uncontrolled airspace.

 

 

Near miss at Boston Logan
points to need for cockpit vigilance!

Who knows why this stuff happens, but thanks to a vigilant co-pilot, disaster was averted at Boston Logan's Airport this past June.  Two tower controllers were working simultaneous departures on the afternoon shift.  The east sector tower controller cleared a US Airways Boeing 737-3B7 for takeoff on runway Runway 9.  That aircraft was carrying 103 passengers and a crew of 6 bound for Philadelphia.

Five seconds later, the west sector tower controller cleared an Aer Lingus Airbus A330-301 for takeoff on Runway 15R.  That aircraft was carrying 260 passengers and a crew of 12 bound for Shannon, Ireland.

The co-pilot of US Airways reported that he had called "V1," and then noticed the Aer Lingus A330 rotating just prior to the intersection of runways 15R and 9. He told the captain to "keep it down," and pushed the control column forward.

He further stated: "The Airbus passed overhead our aircraft with very little separation, and once clear of the intersection, the captain rotated, and we lifted off towards the end of the runway.  I reported to departure control that we had a near miss at which time Aer Lingus reported 'we concur.'"

Heads up crew saved the day!

Any honest pilot will tell you that hearing the words, "Cleared for takeoff" is the signal to advance the throttle(s) to takeoff power.  And that is just what he or she does . . . often without scanning left or right for traffic on intersecting runways.

These words, "cleared for takeoff" are the GO signal to go, period!  We pilots are conditioned to trust the guys in the tower and radar rooms.  They're professionals and they get the job done right. 

Not so fast . . .

It only takes a second or two during the takeoff roll to scan left and right for traffic on an intersecting runway just as the US Air co-pilot did on their takeoff roll.  The investigation of this near miss continues, so we do not know precisely where the chain of faulty events began or where it could have been broken earlier in the process. 

Remember, however, it only takes a second or two to look left or right when cleared to taxi over an active runway.  Heads up behavior is the key to safe operation on all airports, large or small.

Airports are hazardous to flight!

It makes little difference whether you are operating on Boston's Logan International Airport or Smalltown Municipal.  The consequences of trusting somebody else, whether an air traffic controller or another pilot, rests entirely in your hands.  YOU are the one who determines the safe outcome of every flight. 

More accidents occur on the ground than in the air.  And more mid air collisions occur near the airport then in any other phase of flight.  In other words, airports are hazardous to flight.  Be extra-vigilant anytime you are near them!

 

Powerful Training Videos

Web-based information technology is exploding into the flight training field faster than ever before.  In time, every pilot, from student to ATP, will be logging on to some form of on-line flight training each day before leaving home. 

Leading the pack in this technology has been our own AOPA.  These folks have been pushing the web-based training envelope right to the outer edges.  Below are links to two such web-based training sites:

Click on each of these web sites below, then sit back and soak it in!

Winter Weather - http://flash.aopa.org/asf/wxwise_ceilingvis/ 

Engine and Propeller - http://flash.aopa.org/asf/engine_prop/flash.cfm

Many thanks to friend and OTA reader Jeff Myers, AOPA's Executive Vice President -Communications, for sharing these highly effective interactive web presentations with us.

 

The 180 Degree Power Off Approach

The 180 degree power off approach is one of the most important stick and rudder exercises we can practice.  First, it helps us to develop judgment in estimating distances and glide ratios.  Equally important, this exercise gives us the skill to make a safe emergency landing to any airport or suitable landing area from any altitude.  As such, this exercise should be practiced regularly . . . . including when making the final landing to the airport after a long practice session or following a cross-country flight. 

While not included in the private pilot practical test standards (PTS), the 180 degree power off landing is an effective way to impart necessary emergency landing skills to the pre-solo student pilot.

The procedure is simple to perform but achieving mastery takes lots of practice!

The procedure begins on the downwind leg of the traffic pattern.  Abeam the runway numbers, power is reduced to idle.  This power reduction location is called the "Key Point."  It is at this point that the powered aircraft is instantly converted to a glider!   Descent speed is controlled solely by pitch with some help provided by flaps and slips, if necessary.  See the illustration below: 

The real value of the 180 degree power off landing technique comes when it is combined with a high altitude, power off descent over the airport.  This scenario simulates an engine failure while at cruise altitude.  Here, the pilot positions himself directly over an airport or a suitable emergency landing area.  He then descends in slow 360 degree circles until reaching the same "Key Point" used in the 180 degree exercise above.   

Try this exercise while in simulated or actual instrument conditions!

The skills learned in the high altitude 360 degree descending turn enables the pilot to make a safe emergency GPS descent while in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC).  Obviously, engines fail in instrument as well as in VFR conditions.  Yet little, if any, engine failure training is provided to the instrument pilot.  This exercise provides this training.

Here's how it works . . .

Use your GPS to position yourself at least 5,000 feet above an airport while in simulated or actual instrument conditions.  Reduce the throttle to idle, then commence a standard rate turn directly over the airport solely by reference to your GPS moving map.   In most "for real" emergencies of this type, you will break out into VMC conditions at or immediately above the "Key Point."  From there, proceed visually to a safe power off landing.

Obviously, if you are going to practice this maneuver in actual instrument conditions, pick a day when the cloud bases are above the minimum vectoring altitude (MVA) for your airport.  Be sure to obtain the proper ATC block altitude clearance, of course. 

 

Edwards Air Force Base - Airshow Photos

Click HERE here to view a series of neat photos taken at the October 22, 2005 Edwards Air Force Base air show.  Thanks to OTA reader, Paul Pederson of Buffalo, NY, for forwarding us this entertaining site.

 

The NOTAM Nightmare!

Go ahead and make a night landing at that unfamiliar, non-towered airport confident that you have complied with the full meaning and intent of 91.103 (requirement to have all available information).  

Ripping off your landing gear!

Remember, however, it is no fair blaming anybody else for your ripping off of the landing gear and striking the prop on the asphalt as you rolled out over an open trench in the runway you landed on!

Apparently you missed this little runway closure (D) NOTAM in your pre-flight planning.  Okay, so nobody was hurt (seriously) and there were no witnesses, so you escaped FAA enforcement action under FAR 91.13 (careless and reckless operation).  You do have an obligation, however, to notify the NTSB since the damage easily exceeded $25,000.

Tree branches smashing against your wings!

Let's say you get that all straightened out and go on to fly another day.  On your very next flight, you make an instrument landing to minimums at another unfamiliar airport.   You descended through the clag right down to published minimums and as you did, you hear the terrifying sounds of tree branches smashing against your wings. 

Hmmmm . . . this time you failed to check FDC NOTAMs for the temporarily higher MDA (minimum descent altitute) on the approach you used.  Seems trees grow fast around that airport!  The news is good, this time.  Just a little bit of lost paint and several dents in the leading edge that can easily be pounded out.  

Fighter escorts over Ft. Campbell, KY!

Everything is all fixed now.  You decide to file GPS direct from Memphis, Tennessee back to Buffalo, NY.  You receive a standard briefing, then proceed on your merry way home believing your IFR clearance will keep you away from restricted airspace.  Only one little wrinkle.  It seems that your flight took you directly over Ft. Campbell, KY.  Quite naturally, the feds don't want you flying directly over their nuclear arsenal. 

"Nobody ever told me about the Ft. Campbell TFR (Temporary Flight Restriction) and, besides, I was on an instrument flight plan," you say in incredulous disbelief.  Better call your favorite aviation attorney because the FAA will be sure to go after your ticket this time!

Three NOTAM Busts in one year!!!!

Fortunately, not every NOTAM related incident results in serious injuries or FAA enforcement action.  Imagine, if local FSDOs had to pursue every such NOTAM related incident, they wouldn't have time to do anything else.

It is a sad but true state of affairs for pilots these days.  The FAA spews out hundreds of new NOTAMs every day, buries them in coded language and hides them in obscure publications, then expects us to decipher each one prior to every flight we make.

Latest Pilot Game is . . . NOTAM Roulette!

We pilots have two choices.  We can either get serious about checking NOTAMs before every flight or we can play "NOTAM Roulette" and simply launch in blind faith that we will not encounter any.  Unfortunately, "NOTAM Roulette" makes as much sense as playing the Russian kind.  The odds are about the same and the end result may be surprisingly similar!

It is no secret that the NOTAM system (if there is a system) is a real mess.  One would think that you could provide the FSS specialist with the date, time, and route of your flight and he or she, in return, could supply you with all of the pertinent NOTAMs, both old and new.

Sorry, Charlie, it's not going to happen!  As said above, the FAA buries them in the most stilted language, then hides them in obscure publications.   Then, they violate you for not complying with them.  Yep, it is a mess. 

So what is a girl supposed to do?

The best thing you can do is keep a few websites real handy.  Bookmark or plug the following websites into your favorites:

Online NOTAM Sites

AOPA NOTAM site http://flighttraining.aopa.org/flight_bag/notams/

DUATS:  http://www.duats.com/

FAA TFR Map Graphic: http://tfr.faa.gov/tfr/tfrmap.jsp

The NOTAM mess we have been experiencing is slowly getting resolved.  While there is a very long way to go, the day is coming when we will be able to plug our planned route into our Internet browser and, voila', all pertinent NOTAMs will appear!

 

Don't touch those flaps ! !1979 Cessna 152

It was a classic botched landing.  The student pilot of a Cessna 152 was trying to land at the Greenville Downtown Airport, Greenville, SC back in January, 1996. 

According to statements taken by the NTSB, the pilot "had difficulty lining up on the runway due to the effect of a strong quartering tailwind which existed above the surface."

According to the accident report, "The aircraft ballooned during the flare, and the pilot executed a go-around."  With full power and carburetor heat off, the pilot raised all 30 degrees of  flaps, and the aircraft settled. Next, the aircraft's nose was raised and it yawed to the left and stalled.

The aircraft impacted the runway with the nose and the left wing first, approximately 90 degrees to the left of the runway.  The pilot sustained minor injuries.  The airplane was substantially damaged.

Watch what happens when you raise those flaps in flight!

Just as the lowering of flaps increases lift (thereby enabling you to make a steeper descent without a corresponding increase in airspeed), the raising of flaps in flight can cause a momentary decrease in lift.  This is apparently what happened with this accident aircraft. 

In commencing his go around from a botched landing, the student pilot elected to retract all 30 degrees of flaps at once as he was lifting off of the runway.  When he saw himself suddenly settling back to the runway, he pitched the nose upward in a futile attempt to regain lost altitude. 

With the airplane rapidly approaching a stall, ineffective rudder control produced a giant yaw moment.  This caused one wing to drop and strike the runway edge and the nose to be forced down into the concrete runway.  Ouch!!

You gotta know the aerodynamics before you can safely land an airplane!

So many instructors attempt, unsuccessfully, to teach students how to land by "feel."  They say, "Watch me.  Do what I do."

And with that, the hapless student tries to remember what his or her instructor did.   This sort of "monkey see, monkey do" teaching method explains why it takes so long to master landings!

Consistently good landings never happen until the pilot understands what is going on aerodynamically around the airplane as it settles down over the runway.  Unless the pilot understands the relationship between declining airspeed and lift, he has no way of intuitively knowing how to maneuver the controls!  Then, when he maneuvers these controls improperly, a landing accident such as the described here nearly always occurs.

Don't touch the flaps until a positive rate of climb is achieved!

If a go around is necessary and the flaps are all hanging out, one of two actions is immediately required.

1. If you are still on the runway, retract the flaps before lifting off.

2. If you are airborne, do not retract the flaps until you have achieved a positive rate of climb, then retract the flaps 10 degrees at a time. 

 

The Purvasive Internet

Okay, so Vice President Al Gore didn't really invent the Internet.  Nonetheless, it is here to stay.  Those of us who embrace it for all its worth and potential stand to benefit greatly.  The remainder of us who shun its use or believe it to be some sort of Communist plot will soon be left behind.

Obviously, if you are reading Over the Airwaves each week, you must be a believer.  Some of you may be enthusiastic believers who are broadband, high speed Internet aficionados.  Others of you may be struggling along with the caveman qualities of dial up service.  Either way, the future is the Internet, and the future is now!

The future is in broadband, high speed service . . .

Unfortunately, your geographic location may dictate the kind of Internet connection service you have.  But if you have a choice, kill the dial up and go for broadband, high speed service just as quickly as you can!  With more and more graphic intensive as well as animated websites appearing, those without broadband, high speed service soon be left behind.

Over the Airwaves is embracing ever-increasing numbers of graphically intensive linked websites.  Most issues now contain links to videos that can only run properly with high speed Internet access.

Bookmark your aviation favorites . . .

The Internet browser you use (Netscape, Internet Explorer, etc.) enables you to open and save your favorite websites into a custom tailored file structure.  From there, you can go back and recall your favorite websites anytime you like.

If you haven't already done so, begin creating an AVIATION section in the favorites section of your web browser.  Once this is done, be sure to SAVE those sites you find here in Over the Airwaves or which you discover in your own web surfing activities.

 

Beware of the Region of Reverse Command!

It's the classic departure stall/spin scenario.  The hapless pilot advances the throttle to full power for takeoff on a short runway with obstacles.  Instead of using proper short takeoff technique, he holds back pressure on the yoke in a vain attempt to gain altitude as soon as possible. 

His airplane struggles off the ground in high nose up attitude.  "I need more power," he shouts to himself.  He begins to suspect that something is wrong with his engine.  He give one last tug on the yoke or stick.  The gyroscopic effect of the spinning prop exerts its maximum left turning turning force.  When added to the other three left turning forces, e.g., slipstream, P-factor, and torque, the airplane yaws left.  The left wing becomes fully stalled, and drops out from under him as his feet sit perfectly flat on the floor.  [Note:  This pilot never had spin training so he is not on guard for this dangerous aerodynamic condition!]

Witnesses report that the guy was struggling to get over the trees when he suddenly turned into a nose dive and crashed!

Know your L/DMAX!

Recall your study of parasitic and induced drag.  Remember those curves?  Remember where those curves joined on the graph?  That point where they join is called the maximum lift over drag or L/DMAX].  

In other words, L/DMAX] is the speed where the parasitic and induced drag exerts its least combined drag effect on the airplane.  We sometimes think of this as the "best glide speed" or the speed to pitch to when attempting travel the furthest when the engine fails. 

The L/DMAX speed is significant to us for another reason, particularly if our airplane is traveling slower than this airspeed!  When flying at an airspeed below the L/DMAX, adding power makes us go slower, not faster or higher!  This is because we are operating in the region of reverse command (behind the power curve)!  This is what our accident pilot learned the hard way.

Reference to the chart (left) illustrates the region of reverse command.   Points #1 and #2 on the red curve reflect the same power setting. 

Point #2 shows that as power is increased, airspeed increases.  Similarly, as power is decreased, airspeed decreases.  This is what we would expect when operating in the normal airspeed range (above the L/DMAX.)  

Point #1, however, shows what happens when operating in the region of reverse command (behind the power curve).  Here, as power is increased, airspeed decreases.  As power is decreased, airspeed increases!

Enter the Stall/Spin . . .

Our accident pilot, above, found himself operating below his L/DMAX, or behind the power curve.  The more power he added, the slower he went, the less lift he was producing.  With the obstacles at the end of the runway rapidly approaching,  he did what seemed natural.  He pulled back harder on the yoke.  The wing's angle of attack quickly passed through the critical angle and stalled.  When coupled with the four left turning tendencies and inadequate rudder input, the airplane yawed to the left.  This led immediately to the stall/spin . . . close to the ground which is non-recoverable.  Fatalities are nearly always the result.  

What he should have done!

What he should have done, instead, was lower and point the nosedirectly at the obstacles.  To the nonproficient pilot, this may sound counter-productive, e.g., "I need altitude; why lower the nose???"

By lowering the nose, he immediately reduces induced drag and allows the airplane to accelerate out of the region of reverse command and in front of the power curve.  As airspeed increases, so does lift.  Remember, lift increases in proportion to the square of airspeed.

While the theory of aerodynamics may be troubling to learn, once you know and understand it you'll find your actions in the cockpit to be instinctively correct. 

 

Understanding your Vertical Speed Indicator

We stare at our information-giving instruments often without thinking twice about what's going on behind their faces.  Not only do we stare at them, we place our lives in their hands (no pun)!

The Vertical Speed Indicator (VSI) is one of the most responsive of the six flying instruments in our panel.  A quick glance at the VSI will tell us almost instantly if we are going up or down and how fast, in feet per minute.

Here's how the VSI works . . .

The VSI consists of an air tight case containing a simple diaphragm.  The diaphragm is attached to a linkage arm that, in turn, is connected to the indicator needle on the face of the instrument.

The diaphragm is connected directly to the static line in the pitot-static system.  The case is also attached to the static line via a restricted orifice (calibrated leak).

It is all a matter of differential air pressure

As the airplane climbs (or descends), the air pressure within the diaphragm instantly changes relative to the pressure in the surrounding case thereby causing it to expand (increasing pressure) or contract (decreasing pressure).  This expansion or contraction movement is transmitted to the indicator needle on the face of the instrument by the connecting linkage.

When the pressure in the surrounding case equals the pressure inside the diaphragm, via a calibrated leak, the indicator needle returns to zero.  It's as simple as that!

In other words, when the airplane climbs or descends, the pressure inside the diaphragm changes immediately, but due to the metering action of the surrounding case's restricted passage, the case pressure remains higher or lower for a short time, causing the diaphragm to contract or expand. This causes a pressure differential that is indicated on the instrument needle as a climb or descent. When the pressure differential stabilizes at a definite ratio, the needle indicates the rate of altitude change.

Two Different Types of Information

The vertical speed indicator is capable of displaying two different types of information:

• Trend information shows an immediate indication of an increase or decrease in the airplane’s rate of climb or descent.

• Rate information shows a stabilized rate of change in altitude.

For example, if maintaining a steady 500-foot per minute (f.p.m.) climb, and the nose is lowered slightly, the VSI immediately senses this change and indicates a decrease in the rate of climb. This first indication is called the trend. After a short time, the VSI needle stabilizes on the new rate of climb, which in this example, is something less than 500 f.p.m. 

The time from the initial change in the rate of climb, until the VSI displays an accurate indication of the new rate, is called the lag. Rough control technique and turbulence can extend the lag period and cause erratic and unstable rate indications.

 

From my heart to yours . . .

Here is an inspiring message to help you get through the week.  Click HERE to run (it may take a moment or two to run, but you'll find it worth it, I'm sure). 
   
-- Thanks to OTA reader, David Pann of Akron, NY for sharing it with us.

 

Quotable

"More capable airplanes and moving maps with downlink weather draw pilots further to the edge of their abilities with confidence they probably shouldn't have."
    
-- Jeff Van West, Editor, IFR Magazine, December, 2005

A couple of my students recently returned from the Cessna factory with a brand new glass cockpit Turbo 182.  When I asked them about their factory training, they said, "The factory guys told us that upon reaching 500' AGL punch on the auto-pilot and leave it on until you are on short final."

Curiously, the Columbia Aircraft factory instructor intimated the same thing to me earlier this year when Ravi Bansal and I picked up his new Columbia 400.   Apparently both factories have more confidence in their autopilots than in the skill levels of their average customer!

There is no question about it.  Today's new breed of airplanes can carry us deeper and deeper into hostile environments with more built-in information and safety devices than in years past.  This is good!

But there is a bad side, too. 

Button pushing dexterity is rapidly replacing the stick, rudder and basic navigation skills we learned as primary students.  We are seeing primary students with incomplete stick, rudder, and navigation skills stepping right into this new breed of airplane. 

Equally distressing, many experienced pilots are cashing in their stick, rudder, and navigation skills as they grow increasingly dependent upon this new button pushing technology.  I know, because it happened to me.

When I acquired my T-210, I was quickly seduced by the dual moving maps, coupled auto-pilot, and its "known ice" certification.  It did not take long, however, to discover that things break - often at the worst of times.  "Known ice" capability doesn't mean much when your pitot heat quits in icy clouds!  Think about the challenge you face when accumulating ice and only the left wing boots work.  The word "yaw" takes on a whole new meaning!

Autopilot coupled approaches are fun and easy, particular when the clag is right down to minimums.  Couple up on every instrument approach for a year, then try to perform one by hand when the autopilot tanks.  I discovered that experience the hard way.

Stuff really does happen!

I am a great believer in new technology.  I've embraced nearly every new flight enhancement that has come down the road.  But experience has also taught me that basic stick, rudder, navigation, and even aeronautical decision-making skills can never be replaced by a button.  

There will be a day when each of us will experience a total electrical failure at the worst possible time.  Despite government assurances to the contrary, some terrorist or disgruntled postal worker will one day get his (or her) hands on the GPS master switch and immediately send 5,000 PICs aloft over the United States searching for VOR frequencies! 

One thing that some of our newer airplanes that go real fast do is burn lots of gas.  Allow that gas to run out, you will find yourself immediately in a very expensive glider.  If there is one thing that all glider pilots have, it is stick and rudder skills.   Or fly your fully functioning glass composite airplane down the final approach course in a 30 knot gusty crosswind.  You'll wish you spent less time on the buttons and more time on the rudder!

How about the nastiest of all stuff.  You suffer a bit of disorientation in the clouds just as your autopilot makes an uncommanded descending roll to the right.  After punching the autopilot disconnect button you give a tug on the stick.   Your airspeed peels off to Vso minus 10 while still in the clouds.  Your altimeter suddenly unwinds.  You pitch up more aggressively.  Now in an ever-tightening spiral, you plea for help as your attitude indicator, turn coordinator, and even your wet compass are all screaming life-saving signals to you.  You never see them!  Down you go in a media-capturing event that leaves your family in despair.

What stick and rudder proficient pilots know . . .

Stick and rudder proficient pilots require only needle, ball, and airspeed to remain safely under control.  You can take away their autopilots, their glass panels, their uplinked weather, and their ice protected airframes.  Just leave them with the basics and they can generally save the day.

The important point to remember is . . . know your limits and know the limits of your airplane!!

 

Fly Safe!

Bob Miller, ATP, MCFI
Master Certificated Flight Instructor
Buffalo, NY
rjma@rjma.com
716-864-8100

 

 

Read Back

The following are reader comments received over the past two weeks!

"Thanks for taking the time to create such a great resource. You've created a newsletter that has a professional appearance and the sober approach to the content is both informative and refreshing.  I look forward to the next issue."
--Gary Vanderbilt, Pembroke  Pines, FL
 


"A buddy of mine forwarded the link to me - before I knew it I read every word. Great stuff (and relevant!).  I fly a Cessna Skylane out of Lincoln County Airport in North Carolina.  There's only one runway and it seldom aligns with the prevailing wind, so I was very interested in your crosswind article. Keep up the good work!
--Scott Salley, Charlotte, NC
 

This is an excellent source of aviation common sense knowledge. I learned about it from one of my partners at Airventure Flight School in Rochester, NY.
-- Ron Schwartz, Rochester, NY


"I chanced upon your website while browsing. It is great!!!  I love the picture & commentary. I am the author of "Health for Pilots: A Complete Guide to FAA Certification and Self-Care." I could send you a copy if you like. Thanks for a great job (and, in this day of getting charged for everything, a free website).
  
--Paul Gahlinger, MD, PhD, Senior AME, Salt Lake City, UT
 


"I heard "Over the Airwaves!" from a pilot friend. It's great!"
  -- Luis Camus, Sedona, AZ


"New CFI after 35 years of personal flying. Your newsletter was recommended on a Yahoo list for CFIs (CFI_Notebook)."
  --John Loram, Ashland, OR


"I found "Over the Airwaves" by doing a Google search for "Lean of peak" and really enjoyed reading the entire newsletter."
   -- Anthony Nalli, Brampton, Ontario.


"I fly professionally and really enjoyed the articles. I look forward to reading them in the future."
 
-- Ward Reesman, Omaha, NE


"Great newsletter!"
 
--Jim Markovitz, Penfield, NY
 


"Very informative and upbeat newsletter."
 
-- Lance Spencer, Brocton, NY


"I received your address from John Anderson in New Hampshire he spoke very highly of your articles for a student pilot of any level. After reading your article regarding to steep a climb on an aborted landing attempt I realized I am reading essential learning material for anyone who flys! We can never get to much information on procedures that could and will save our lives and those we love by keeping a cool head and applying principals of flight no matter how dire the situation."
  --
Doug Zieschang, student pilot, Englewood, FL


"Some really good reading, undoubtedly improving ones awareness, reducing what we don't know that we didn't know..."
  -- Robert Trepp, Dowerin, Western Australia


"A friend of mine, Rob Robinson, forwarded your newsletter to me. I really enjoyed reading it and appreciate the information! "
 
-- Tom Hodgins, MEII, Brockport, NY

 

Click HERE to view what other readers have had to say about "Over the Airwaves."       

 
 

FREE Sign Up for
 "Over the Airwaves" 

If this issue of Over the Airwaves was forwarded to you by a friend, you can order your own free future copies of this bi-weekly e-publication by simply clicking HERE  and completing the very brief signup form.

 

Your Comments or
Questions, Please!

Over the Airwaves is not intended to be your typical training, official news, or club-type social journal.  Instead, its intent is to stimulate thought, enhance aviation critical thinking skills, to encourage the strong pilot, and to disturb the weaker pilot.  With this breadth of scope, Over the Airwaves will evoke a number of reactions.  Please feel free to share these reactions with me by clicking HERE
 
 

Past Issues of  Over the Airwaves

Click HERE to open any previous issue(s) of Over the Airwaves and to search for any past articles.
 
 

 
[Disclaimer:  Material contained in this e-newsletter is for informational purposes only.  It should not be construed as directive, doctrinal, or instructive.  Readers should consult with their flight schools, certificated flight instructors, Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) and/or appropriate FAA publications including the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), the Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM), and applicable FAA Advisory Circulars (ACs) for specific guidance relative to any information or before employing any recommendations contained in this e-publication.  Further, nothing in this e-publication is intended to be inconsistent with or contrary to any official FAA rule or regulation, nor should such material be interpreted or construed as such.  Over the Airwaves is intended exclusively for the purpose of promoting and enhancing heightened reader awareness of flight safety issues. This website is not a substitute for competent flight instruction.  There are no representations or warranties of any kind made pertaining to this service/information and any warranty, express or implied, is excluded and disclaimed including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose. Under no circumstances or theories of liability, including without limitation the negligence of any party, contract, warranty or strict liability in tort, shall the website creator/author or any of its affiliated or related organizations be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages as a result of the use of, or the inability to use, any information provided through this service even if advised of the possibility of such damages.]

Hit Counter